A few years ago I visited around 200 ecolodges, homestays, community run guests houses etc around the world as part of my research for a book on the best in sustainable tourism. As a result of my experiences, I knew I would always seek out these places for my own holidays. Not just because of their ethics, but because I had a much better time. I met more inspiring people, got closer to wildlife, stayed in more remarkable places.
Over the last two months I have been exploring what has happened since then. I have stayed in a couple of inns, several caravans parks and campsites, a city centre hotel and six airbnb flats, as I have written about recently. When I first stayed in an airbnb, four years ago in New York, it was because there was no affordable hotel where I wanted to go. Such has been the development of the service – and my experiences with it – that my attitude to it has now flipped. I now look first for an airbnb, and only if I can’t find anywhere do I look for a guesthouse or lodge.
Why? So much of what inspired me about responsible tourism I get from airbnb. I stay in real places, not tourist ghettos, which connects me to food markets, independent shops and cafes the residents use. I enjoy the interactions with my hosts. But in addition, I get as much space as if I was staying in the presidential suite, but for the price of a budget room at a backpackers. And I love having a kitchen so that I can cook using local ingredients.
What concerns me, however, as someone eager to see the development of responsible tourism, is that I reckon I am fairly typical of the sort of person who seeks our responsible hotels and ecolodges. I doubt the change in my travel patterns are uncommon. So if independent travellers like me are shifting in significant numbers to staying in airbnbs, what effect does that have on responsible hotels and lodges? And how should they respond?
If the answer is to drop prices in an attempt to match airbnb, then this race to the bottom is going to cause problems for staff, communities and projects that rely on that income, and for the hotels’ ability to provide an experience that attracts tourists like me in the first place. If, on the other hand, the aim is not to match airbnb, but to differentiate from it, then I think there’s a chance these responsible lodges can prosper alongside.
I compare this to music, another of my loves. The massive growth of free, downloadable music has not killed off the record industry. Nor have efforts to fight digital music in court had any impact. In the UK vinyl is seeing sales like never before. Successful producers have not tried to compete on price and convenience with MP3. They have made their records better quality. Designed more collectable covers. Included additional extras. Everywhere possible they have improved the offer in ways the MP3 can never do.
It seems to me that if responsible tourism follows this model of focussing on promoting what it offers that the sharing economy can’t – rather than attempting to beat airbnb at its own game, or by challenging its emerging model on legal grounds – then there is room for both formats to succeed.
I would be keen to hear from responsible accommodation providers in areas where they now compete with airbnb rentals, to know if my assumption is correct. Have their occupancy rates been hit? How are they responding?
Latest posts by Jeremy Smith (see all)
- Innovator Spotlight: Janine Duffy of Echidna Walkabout - July 15, 2015
- What happens when tourism reaches the limits to its growth? - July 13, 2015
- Why tourism industry should lead efforts for gay rights - June 29, 2015
- Why is tourism industry so quiet about climate change? - June 17, 2015
- Five steps to a successful towel and linen reuse scheme - June 1, 2015